Legal Opinion

Google, Inc. v. Hood

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 27, 2015No. Civil Action No. 3:14cv981-HTW-LRAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HENRY T. WINGATE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Google, Inc. submits this juridical preemptive strike against Jim Hood, the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, asking this court to hold that it, Google, Inc., is shielded by the applicable law from the Attorney General’s alleged demands and accompanying real threats to prosecute Google, Inc., both civilly and criminally for allowing third-party creators of obnoxious, tasteless and criminal content to publish such on the search engine of Google, Inc., without censure or proper restriction, for public consumption.

The Attorney General,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Publius v. Boyer-VineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API