Legal Opinion
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 15, 2018No. 18-5261PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam *1016 Upon consideration of Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies' emergency motion for a stay pending appeal, the responses thereto, the reply, the motion for leave to file a surreply, and the lodged surreply, it is
ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a surreply be granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged surreply. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal of the district court's order vacating 11 C.F.R § 109.10 (e)(1)(vi) be denied. Appellant has not satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay pending appeal. See Nken v. Holder , 556…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Koi Nation of N. Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Peri & Sons Farms, Inc. v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Citizens for Responsibility v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Alabama Association of Realtors v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- American Heritage Railways, Inc. v. HirouDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.