Legal Opinion
Brosterhous v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1995No. S043692PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Keller v. State Bar of California (1990) 496 U.S. 1 [110 L.Ed.2d 1, 110 S.Ct. 2228], this court and the State Bar of California (State Bar) established procedures by which a member’s challenge to the State Bar’s annual calculation of the amount of compulsory membership dues to be used for “political activities” is to be resolved by arbitration. A member who objects to use of that proportional part of his or her dues may then deduct the sum from the dues payment.
The question presented in this case is whether a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Pacific Lumber Co. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.