Legal Opinion

Kreager v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1918No. 8838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by E. P. McCormick against Mary D. Kreager and Lorenzo Grier. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

The defendant in error commenced this action in the trial court as the holder of four certain tax bills that had been issued Dy the city of Tulsa evidencing a claim and lien for street improvements made in improvement district No. 79 of that city, to enforce the claim and to foreclose the lien against certain lots belonging to the plaintiffs in error: each tax bill being a claim and lien against a separate lot located in such improvement district.

There was a demurrer to the petition which • was overruled and exceptions saved, when the plaintiff in error answered by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nitsche v. State Security Bank of Zanesville, OhioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Enid Conservative Inv. Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berry v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Grier v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Colvin v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API