Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1935No. 25307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant in error, Hanchett Bond Company, a corporation, filed in the district court of Tulsa county its action against Virgil Rowe, Mary Rowe, Home Building & Loan Association, a corporation, Guaranty Roofing Company, a corporation. and the city of Tulsa, Okla., to foreclose a tax bill on certain real estate situated in the city of Tulsa. The Home Building & Loan Association filed its answer and cross-petition against the plaintiff and all the codefendants to foreclose a mortgage which it had on this real property. On proper motion Evelyn Johnson Rowe, Becker Roofing Company, and Joe…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Caruth v. State Ex Rel. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Short v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burkhart v. LasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Goldsmith v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Wilson v. UptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Ferguson v. HilbornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Wilson v. UptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API