Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Palarino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1951No. Appeals, 121, 122 and 137PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Five defendants — Louis Palarino, Paul Madden,. Danny Vranick, Eddie Stanks and Malcolm Epstein— were jointly indicted for the armed robbery of one Bernard Kessler. Epstein entered a plea of guilty and became the Commonwealth’s chief witness. Vranick was confined in a hospital and therefore was not tried. Palarino, Madden and Stanks, appellants herein, stood trial and were found guilty. Motions for a new trial were refused. Subsequently Epstein, upon whose testi mony the Commonwealth had relied most strongly (although there was some corroborating evidence), recanted,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Com. Ex Rel. Paige v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. MinnichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  5. Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wilson v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. HaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. FINKELSTEINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API