Commonwealth v. Palarino
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
Five defendants — Louis Palarino, Paul Madden,. Danny Vranick, Eddie Stanks and Malcolm Epstein— were jointly indicted for the armed robbery of one Bernard Kessler. Epstein entered a plea of guilty and became the Commonwealth’s chief witness. Vranick was confined in a hospital and therefore was not tried. Palarino, Madden and Stanks, appellants herein, stood trial and were found guilty. Motions for a new trial were refused. Subsequently Epstein, upon whose testi mony the Commonwealth had relied most strongly (although there was some corroborating evidence), recanted,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Com. Ex Rel. Paige v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth v. MinnichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wilson v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. HaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FINKELSTEINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.