Legal Opinion

Roesner v. Darrah

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1902No. 12,627PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from McPherson district court; M. P. Simpson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, O. J. :

This was an action for damages for alienating the affections of a wife and for her seduction. A verdict and judgment were rendered for defendant. The errors claimed are the admission and the rejection of evidence and the giving of instructions. As to the latter, exceptions were not preserved ; hence, the instructions cannot be reviewed.

The plaintiff offered his own testimony as to the defendant’s visits to his home, as to his wife’s apparent change of attitude and feeling toward him after she became acquainted with defendant, and as to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. HambaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Higbee v. McMillanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Edgell v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Van Fleet v. StoutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Coles v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kirkpatrick v. WickwireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Mumper v. WebsterOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hinds v. Dandee Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API