Legal Opinion
Mumper v. Webster
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.
TMs is an action for alienating the affections of Frank Alfano, plaintiff’s former husband, from whom she is now divorced. Upon the trial of the cause before the court and jury, plaintiff, over the objections of defendant, was permitted to prove the following declarations alleged to have been made by Alfano:
Charles Bossio testified as follows:
“The conversation was that Frank Alfano told me that he was in kind of a bad boat. I said, ‘What do you mean?’ ‘Why,’ he said, ‘I think Vida is pregnant.’ ‘Well,’ I says, ‘You will have to marry the girl, that is all.’ He said, ‘How can I? I didn’t get…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Schneider v. TapferOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Coles v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Roesner v. DarrahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raborn v. HaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Noteboom v. SavinOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Clark v. OrrSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- McKinnon v. ChenowethOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Noteboom v. SavinOregon Supreme Court · 1958