Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Dandee Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1952No. 34892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the witness, Eve Birt, wife of the president of the Dandee Manufacturing Company, was a competent witness for the company to corroborate the testimony of her husband. The trial court overruled the defendant’s objection to her competency and submitted the cause to a jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiff. From this verdict and the judgment rendered thereon by the trial court, defendant appeals.

The action was brought by Dandee Manufacturing Company, a corporation, to recover from defendant, Hinds, the purchase price of certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gaines Bros. Co. v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Higbee v. McMillanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Vanderslice v. VandersliceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Brown v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Western Nat. Life Ins. v. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crossett v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. LATIGO OIL & GAS v. BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
  3. Griffin Grocery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API