Allen v. Narver
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
The question presented on this appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order of court denying defendants’ motion for a new trial involves the interpretation of a lease made by plaintiff to defendants of certain lands for use in extracting oil and other mineral substances therefrom, the express consideration therefor being a royalty of one-eighth of the mineral so extracted.
The provision of the lease upon which the action is based is as follows: “It is further expressly agreed and understood, that in the event that the second parties (defendants) shall…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glasgow v. Chartiers Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Escondido Oil & Development Co. v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Risch v. BurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- McComber v. KellermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Gibson v. OliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barquin v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Kelly v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wooton v. McAdooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hindin v. CaineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.