McComber v. Kellerman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The complaint states a cause of action to recover the sum of eighteen hundred and fifty dollars alleged to be due upon certain covenants for the payment of rent contained in a so-called oil lease. The appeal was taken to the district court of appeal for the second district. That court, conceiving it to be a ease not within its jurisdiction under the constitution, made an order, as provided by the rules of this court, transferring the case to this court because of the fact that the appeal was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Long Beach City School District v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Jack v. SinsheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Escondido Oil & Development Co. v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Kelly v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- MacCo Construction Co. v. FickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- John v. Elberta Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.