Legal Opinion

Lee v. Vance Executive Protection, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2001No. 00-1330UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Present and former executive protection agents (“Agents”) appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of their employer Vance Executive Protection, Inc., (“Vance”) on the Agents’ Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) claim seeking overtime compensation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions.

I

Agents employed by Vance serve as bodyguards for corporate officers and visiting dignitaries who contract with Vance for security services. The parties agree that the Agents typically work twelve-hour shifts, but on occasion are required to work more than twelve hours…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. James Frye v. Baptist Memorial Hospital, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Deloatch v. Harris Teeter, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Alston v. DIRECTV, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  4. Smith v. Central Security Bureau, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002
  5. Ingram v. HagenDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API