Legal Opinion

In re Dancy Drainage District

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

One of the contentions presented on this appeal, namely, whether or not the first issue in 1907 of the obligations of the district became, were, and are prior, paramount, and first liens upon the assessment for benefits as then made on the entire district, was a question squarely presented on the first appeal and necessarily then and there determined and in the affirmative, and became and is the law of the case as between those interested in this drainage district and the holders of the first series of obligations.

Although particular stress is now laid by counsel for holders of unpaid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koshkonong v. BurtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. In re Dancy Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. McMahon v. Lower Baraboo River Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dancy Drainage District v. Hanchett Bond Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Rose v. American National Bank of Beaver DamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Porizky v. United Fidelity Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Wood County v. Wood County Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Tolman v. Clark County Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API