Legal Opinion

Reichenberger v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1944No. Civil No. 4732PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is a suit by tbe Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District to have determined the validity of a proposed refunding’ bond issue, and it is brought in pursuance of Section 75-745, Arizona Code Annotated 1939. The petitioner is an agricultural improvement district. In 1937 the electors of said district authorized it to issue its bonds for the purpose of financing or refinancing obligations of the Salt River Valley Water Users Association.

The first bond issue under such authorization, designated as Bond Issue Number One, was for $9,969,-000 and was a first lien on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. TeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State Ex Rel. Maestri v. CaveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. St. Charles County v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Selby v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. State v. City of New Smyrna BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Apache County v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Westburne Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Design & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC v. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Adams v. PritchardIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API