Legal Opinion

Chelwyn Associates v. Lupowitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This is an appeal from the lower court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss the proceedings below and to dissolve a preliminary injunction for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm for the reasons stated herein.

Appellant and one P. Bertram Linn executed a written partnership agreement on November 9,1965, for the purpose of constructing and operating an apartment complex known as Oak Summit Apartments. The partnership was to be known as Chelwyn Associates. On July 17, 1968, the partnership agreement was amended by a second written agreement whereby Linn resigned from Chelwyn and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Zerbe Township School District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Witney v. Lebanon CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. University Square No. 1, Inc. v. MarhoeferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Mixer, Inc. v. SMITHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanitary Sewer Authority v. Dial Associates Construction Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Camden Securities Co. v. LupowitzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Danella Environmental Technologies Inc. v. V.J. Auto Service Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1990
  4. Pizzi v. Nissan Motors Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API