Legal Opinion

Camden Securities Co. v. Lupowitz

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-3742PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

The defendant, Harold Lupowitz, has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(7) on the ground that the plaintiffs have failed to join an indispensable party-the partnership of which all of the parties are members. The defendant has also moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the ground that the issues raised in the complaint are within the scope of the arbitration clause contained in the partnership agreement between the parties. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, the defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carlsberg Resources Corporation v. Cambria Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Chelwyn Associates v. LupowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Lupowitz v. HeineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Stainton v. TarantinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Hagstrom v. BreutmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Turner v. CF&I STEEL CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. VMS/PCA Ltd. Partnership v. PCA Partners Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API