Legal Opinion

Hall v. Philadelphia Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Harrison County. Action by Fabius E. Hall and others against The Philadelphia Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

RobiNson, Judge :

The Philadelphia Company was under contract with Hall and his wife, by the terms of an usual oil and gas lease, to furnish them free gas for domestic use from a producing gas well drilled on their land under the lease. By a connection which they had made with the well, the Halls were using the gas in their dwelling, depending on it for light and fuel. They were also burning the gas at one place outside the dwelling, to light the way to other buildings. The company, claiming that the outside light was not domestic use, notified Hall and his wife to extinguish it. Because they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hurxthal v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Unfried v. Balt. & O. R'd Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Union Stopper Co. v. McGaraWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Union Stopper Co. v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Earl T. Browder, Inc. v. County Court of Webster CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Watts v. Ohio Valley Electric Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Horn v. BowenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. O'Neal v. Transportation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API