Legal Opinion
Clark v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 13, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-1891Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RALPH CLARK, ) Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01891 (UNA) UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff filed a complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on June 25, 2019. He failed to comply with District of Columbia Local Civil Rule 5.1(c), in that he listed a P.O. Box as his address, which is only permitted upon leave of court. The Court issued an order, see ECF No. 3, directing plaintiff to either file an amended complaint listing his full resident address or to file a separate motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Roth, Pamela v. King, RufusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Reddy v. O'CONNORDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.