Legal Opinion
Wine Ry. Appliance Co. v. Baltimore & OR Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1935No. 3791PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in a suit which asked relief on account of the infringement of fifteen patents relating to locking devices for the doors of drop bottom or hopper bottom railroad cars. Four of these patents and a number of the claims of the remaining eleven were withdrawn from suit at the time of the hearing in the court below. Three of the patents were held valid and infringed as to the claims involved; and the defendant has not appealed from this holding. Three others were held invalid; and complainant assigns no error with respect to them. This appeal relates to the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Saco-Lowell Shops v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Marvel Specialty Company, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Bell Hosiery Hills, Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.