Legal Opinion
Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Brenner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
This motion seeks summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P. There being no material issue of fact in dispute, the defendant by way of cross-relief also seeks summary judgment.
The jurisdiction of the Court is invoked on several grounds: 28 U.S.C. §§ 1361, 2201, 1338, and 5 U.S.C. § 1009.
By decision of June 9, 1965 the Commissioner of Patents (hereinafter “the Commissioner”) denied plaintiff's petition requesting that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board be directed to proceed with the Opposition to the mark of application serial No. 201,514 in both Classes 51 and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Helvering v. Wilshire Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Monsanto Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Benson Hotel Corporation v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- The Dayton Power and Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Ohio Fuel Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Woods v. Benson Hotel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- United States v. 56 Cartons Containing 19,500 Copies of a Magazine Entitled "Hellenic Sun"District Court, D. Maryland · 1966