Legal Opinion

Woods v. Benson Hotel Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 2628PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, District Judge.

This is an action by the Housing Expediter under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 80th Cong, Public Law 129, Ch. 163, 1947 U.S.C. Cong., Service, p. 200, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1881 et seq., to enjoin defendant from charging over-ceiling rem- and to compel refunds to tenants of any over-ceiling rents already collected. Defendant, by counter-claim, seeks to enjoin plaintiff and the Area Rent Director from interfering in any manner with the collection, receipt, or retention by defendant of any rents whatsoever. The present proceedings arose from motions for a preliminary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. United States v. Fritz Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
  3. Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  4. Bray v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  5. Fruitco Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API