Legal Opinion
The Dayton Power and Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Ohio Fuel Gas Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 10, 1958No. 13565_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
The Dayton Power and Light Company became a party by intervention before the Commission and has sought review of, the order under consideration. Both the Commission and intervenor have filed motions to dismiss Dayton's petition on the ground that Dayton had not made timely application for rehearing. The order was issued June 29, 1956. It is claimed that Dayton’s application was not “filed” until August 2, 1956, and for that reason was rejected by the Commission.
Section 19(a) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 717r) provides that a party such as Dayton may apply for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Power Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sherwood Bros. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Boston Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Ball Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Lincoln v. BD. OF COM'RS OF TIPPECANOE CTY.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Public Service Commission of the State of New York, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation Sun Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. General Crude Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. M.H. Marr, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. Continental Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, v Federal Power Commission, Sun Oil Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Public Service Commission v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.