Foster v. Rowley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham; Wisner, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Seymour Foster against Louis E. Rowley for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
In April, 1893, the defendant was ap-
pointed postmaster of Lansing, to succeed the plaintiff. After defendant’s appointment, and shortly before taking possession, he had various conversations with plaintiff in which the subject of purchasing of the plaintiff the furniture then in the office was discussed. A new post office was in process of construction by the government. Some time thereafter a purchase price was agreed upon between the parties, at $206.25, $100 of which was paid down, and time given for the balance. This action is brought to recover the balance claimed to be due.
It appears…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marthinson v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Campau v. LaffertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Craig v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Dunks v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Moore v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- People v. BrottMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Houston Motor Car Co. v. BrashearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.