State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of the Ford Motor Company this conrt granted its writ of certiorari to review the action of the district conrt for Hennepin county Steele, J., in the matter of a proceeding instituted by the city of Minneapolis and commonly known as “Special Street Acquisition No. 132.”
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The Ford Motor Company, by writ of certiorari, has brought before this court, for review, the action of the district court confirming the proceedings by which the city council of the city of Minneapolis laid out and established an alley through the land of the company in block 9 of Hoag’s Addition in that city.
The company contends that the city is not taking its property for alley purposes, but, under the pretense of establishing an alley, is in fact condemning a right of way for a switching track from the Great Northern Railway to' the property of the parties who petitioned for the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Niagara Falls & Whirlpool Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Ligare v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- County of Hennepin v. MikulaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. GroppoliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.