International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg and Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Appellee, the International Order of the Daughters of Job (Job’s Daughters), sued appellant Lindeburg and Co. (Lindeburg), for trademark infringement arising out of Lindeburg’s manufacture and sale of jewelry bearing the Job’s Daughters insignia. The district judge granted judgment for Job’s Daughters. Lindeburg appeals, invoking appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand.
Job’s Daughters is a young women’s fraternal organization. Since its establishment in 1921 it has used its name and emblem 1 as collective marks. 2 Since its inception Job’s…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Centaur Communications, Limited v. A/s/m Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Boston Athletic Association v. Mark Sullivan, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Edmund A. Rachel, AKA Peter Rachel, D/B/A Wildlife Interiors, Plaintiff v. Banana Republic, Inc., Fisher Development, Inc., and the Gap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.