Legal Opinion
Bousfield v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
In moving for summary judgment, Farmers claimed that Alice was a named insured under the policy covering the Bousfield automobile and that under the exclusion provisions of the policy, the coverage did not extend to damages sustained by Alice. The pertinent provisions of the policy are as follows:
“Definition of ‘Named Insured’ and ‘Insured’ under Part I.(1) If the insured named in item 1 of the declarations is an individual, the term ‘named insured’ includes his spouse if a resident of the same household;
“(2) The unqualified word ‘insured’ includes (a) with respect to any automobile as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Cernohorsky v. Northern Liquid Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Perlick v. Country Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Zimmermann v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hintz v. Darling Freight, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Borkin v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Amplicon, Inc. v. Marshfield ClinicDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1992