Legal Opinion

Cernohorsky v. Northern Liquid Gas Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1955PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

From the pleadings it appears that the defendant, Northern Liquid Gas Company, is engaged in the business of selling liquefied petroleum gas, installing equipment, regulators, containers, and pipe lines. It delivers liquefied gas from its trucks to consumers’ containers. The impleaded defendant, Pure Oil Company, manufactures and processes liquid gas.

In the Cernohorsky amended complaint, which is similar to the others, it is alleged in part:

“That Joseph Cerny owns and operates a resort business in the town of Barnes, . . . that among other things on said premises is a well . . . ; that said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  2. George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. v. Howard Brass & Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Depner v. United States National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  3. Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. Ferchill GroupCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  4. Fire Association of Phila. v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  5. Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API