Legal Opinion
Geosearch, Inc. v. Andrus
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided February 20, 1981No. C80-205K, C80-258K, C80-259K and C80-292KPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION.
KERR, Senior District Judge.
These four cases arise under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, 41 Stat. 437, 30 U.S.C. §§ 181-226. There are common issues of fact and law in all four cases and this Court ordered on November 19, 1980 that the four cases be consolidated.
The plaintiff in all four cases is Geo-search, Inc. (Geosearch). Geosearch is an organization which sends standardized form letters to second drawees under the simultaneous oil and gas leasing system, offering to search for any possible defects in the offer of the first drawee. Should a potential defect…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church and State v. The City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Ballard E. Spencer Trust, Inc., a Corporation v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Naartex Consulting Corp. v. WattDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Park County Resource Council, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1985
- Arkla Exploration Co. v. WattDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- Pullman v. ChorneyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.