Legal Opinion
Premier International Associates LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided May 19, 2008No. 4:07-cv-00395PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID FOLSOM, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Stay Litigation Pending Reexamination (2:07-cv-395, Dkt. No. 55 1 & 2:07-cv-396, Dkt. No. 135 2 ). Various defendants have provided a Supplemental Motion stating that they would agree to a stipulation limiting the use of certain reexamination prior art and would specifically agree to the stipulation ordered in Data Treasury v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 2:07—cv-395 (E.D.Tex. Jan. 10, 2007). 2:07-cv-395, Dkt. No. 57 3 ; 2:07-cv-396, Dkt. No. 141 4 . A hearing was held regarding this matter on April 7, 2008 and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- In re Webyention LLC '294 Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Jager Pro Incorporated v. Backwoods Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020