Legal Opinion
Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 24, 2009No. Civil Action H-08-2531PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Stay and Motion for Continuance of Trial Setting (Doc. Nos. 24, 34.) After considering the parties’ filings and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion to Stay should be denied and the Motion for Continuance should be granted in part.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281-285. In November 2006, Plaintiff Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”) was issued United States Patent No. 7,140,443 (the “'443 Patent”) entitled “Pipe Handling Device, Method,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Technology Licensing Corp. v. Videotek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ada Solutions, Inc. v. Engineered Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Wonderland Nurserygoods Co. v. Thorley Industries, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- FlatFrog Laboratories, AB v. Chemtronics Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2024
- PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC. v. Flywheel Sports, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Ravin Crossbows, LLC v. Hunter's Manufacturing Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023