Legal Opinion

Dress v. Harrisburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1926No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for injuries sustained by falling on an alleged defective sidewalk; defendant has appealed.

The judgment cannot be sustained. Walnut Street, in the defendant city, extends, inter alia, easterly from Front Street to River Avenue, a short block, on the south side of which is the public library building, erected in 1912. The entire width of the south sidewalk there is eleven feet, but standing therein adjoining the curb are six shade trees, surrounded by grass plots approximately four feet wide and ten feet long. It is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Burns v. City of BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Duncan v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Martin v. WilliamsportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Emery v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Foster Et Ux. v. West View Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Schaut v. St. Marys' BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Schramm v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Chase v. City of ErieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API