Legal Opinion

In re Van Tuyl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1905No. 14,457PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Original proceeding in habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

At its session of 1901 the legislature passed an act enabling cities of the first class to provide by ordinance for the prohibition of the sale of intoxicating liquors contrary to law and for the suppression of liquor nuisances. The method whereby such ordinances may be enforced was definitely prescribed, as follows:

“Such ordinances may be enforced by imposing as a penalty for the violation of the same a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars, and imprisonment for not less than thirty days nor more than…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bostock v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  2. Anderson v. City of WellingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Huesing v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In re JarvisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. City of Assaria v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Garden City v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. City of Kansas City v. HenreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Trimble v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Karr v. StahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Hines v. StahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API