Legal Opinion

Hines v. Stahl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1908No. 15,673PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Charles M. Hines brought an action against Frank M. Stahl to recover the possession of a quantity of intoxicating liquors. An order of delivery was procured, upon which the property was taken from the defendant and delivered to the plaintiff. Thereupon the plaintiff dismissed his action. A trial was then had in accordance with the statute (Civ. Code, § 184) to determine the defendant’s right of possession. He testified that when the action was begun he 'was the city marshal and chief of police of the city of Topeka and held the liquor under a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Van TuylSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Funk & Hardman v. IsraelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  3. Hegewisch v. . SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Fries & Co. v. PorchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. Shull v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Clemons v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. First National Bank of Council Bluffs v. BurkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. City of Topeka v. StahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Phillips v. American Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API