Legal Opinion

Karr v. Stahl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1907No. 14,941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

Where an officer takes personal property •from the owner by virtue of a writ issued in void legal proceedings, can such owner maintain replevin therefor against the officer? This is the sole question involved in this controversy.

The plaintiff, William A. Karr, was a druggist and pharmacist in the city of Topeka. The defendant, Frank M. Stahl, was chief of police in that city. On July 31, 1904, a warrant was duly issued by the police court for the arrest of Karr, and for the search of his premises and the seizure of all intoxicating liquors…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westenberger v. WheatonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. In re Van TuylSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Hoisington v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Blair v. ShewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. Gross v. BogardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Clemons v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Greentree v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Stephens v. CurtnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Allison v. HernSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API