Legal Opinion

Greenwald v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 27, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0045PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Ford Motor Company (Ford) appeals from the trial court’s denial of sanctions under Ariz. R. Civ. P. 68 (Rule 68). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 12-2101(B) and affirm, finding that Ford cannot benefit from the Rule 68 sanctions because its offer did not fully comply with the rule.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 The driver of a 1991 Ford Explorer died as a result of injuries suffered in a single-vehicle accident, which occurred when she lost control of the vehicle after the tread separated from the left rear tire.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Wersch v. Radnor/LandgrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Nunez v. NunezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Crown Properties, Inc. v. Financial Security Life InsuranceHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Merlina v. JejnaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Kikuchi v. BrownHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Pargman v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Jones v. MedtronicDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API