Greenwald v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Ford Motor Company (Ford) appeals from the trial court’s denial of sanctions under Ariz. R. Civ. P. 68 (Rule 68). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 12-2101(B) and affirm, finding that Ford cannot benefit from the Rule 68 sanctions because its offer did not fully comply with the rule.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 The driver of a 1991 Ford Explorer died as a result of injuries suffered in a single-vehicle accident, which occurred when she lost control of the vehicle after the tread separated from the left rear tire.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Wersch v. Radnor/LandgrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Nunez v. NunezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Crown Properties, Inc. v. Financial Security Life InsuranceHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Merlina v. JejnaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Kikuchi v. BrownHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
- Pargman v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Jones v. MedtronicDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.