Legal Opinion
Marshall v. City of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 27, 1948No. 1 Div. 327PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
The City of Mobile, pursuant to the general law (Title 37, § 774 et seq., Code 1940), adopting a zoning ordinance for the municipality, establishing varying districts, among the first of which is known as “A-Residential District,” including single family dwellings, schools and colleges, libraries, churches, police and fire department stations, parks, recreation buildings, golf club buildings and accessory uses incident to these matters.
Complainant Robert L. Marshall is the owner of a lot situated at the corner of Dauphin and Pine streets in the said city, fronting 57…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ball v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- AMERICAN PETROLEUM EQUIP. AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. FancherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Waters v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Episcopal Foundation of Jefferson County v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Cudd v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.