Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cannon

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1923No. 7045PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Following conviction in the Corporation Court of the city of Texarkana, Texas, relator sued out a writ of habeas corpus attacking the validity of the ordinance under which conviction was had. Said ordinance is as follows:

“AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED ‘AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING MALE AND FEMALE PERSONS FROM ASSOCIATING TOGETHER FOR IMMORAL PURPOSES, DEFINING AND STATING WHAT SHALL CONSTITUTE ASSOCIATING TOGETHER FOR IMMORAL PURPOSES, PRESCRIBING PENALTIES, REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.’

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Milliken v. City CouncilTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ex Parte Clem McCarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SmytheCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Coker v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API