Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Smythe

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1930No. 13469PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Relator was charged with violating an ordinance of the City of Marshall. Being arrested and confined in the city jail under said charge, he sued out a writ of habeas corpus and upon a hearing, was remanded, from which order he appeals to this Court.

Relator was arrested under the following complaint:

“I, E. H. Whitehurst do solemnly swear that I have good reason to believe, and do believe, that A. M. Smythe on or about the 29th day of January, A. D. 1930 in the territorial limits of the City of Marshall in Harrison County, Texas, and before the making and filing of this complaint,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of St. Louis v. GlonerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Milliken v. City CouncilTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Ex Parte Clem McCarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. City of Georgetown v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Neel v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Noell v. City of CarrolltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API