Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Clem McCarver

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1898No. 1524PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEHDERSOH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a proceeding under a writ of habeas corpus. It appears in the city of Graham, Young Count}1-, the city council have passed what is termed a “curfew ordinance,” as follows:

“Ordinance Ho. 30.
“An ordinance prohibiting persons under the age of twenty-one years from remaining or being found upon the streets of Graham after nine o’clock at night.
“Be it ordained by the city council of the city of Graham, in session assembled, that:
“Section 1. Any person under the age of twenty-one years who shall be found upon any of the streets or alleys of the city of Graham…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of St. Louis v. FitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bykofsky v. Borough of MiddletownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. City of Seattle v. PullmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Hayes v. Municipal Court of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. People v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API