Legal Opinion

Coker v. Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant was tried and fined in the municipal court of Fort Smith on a charge of “being on the street with a prostitute. ’ ’ He appealed to the circuit court, and, on his trial there, was again found guilty and fined, and has appealed to this court.

At his trial in the Circuit court an instruction was given, over his objection and exception, which reads as follows: “1. The court instructs the jury that, if you find from the evidence that the defendant, Troy Coker, in the city of Fort Smith, and within one year next before the bringing of this suit, being a male person over the age of fourteen…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  3. Buell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  4. Paralee v. CamdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  5. Ex Parte CannonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Carroll Ex Rel. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. City of St. Louis v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API