Legal Opinion
Steadman v. Steadman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 1986No. 85-417PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Marjorie Steadman seeks review of final orders entered in the Superior Court relating to this divorce action and related proceedings. The judge ordered that appellee Charles Steadman be allowed to recover a portion of pendente lite alimony payments made to the appellant, that he be awarded attorneys’ fees, and that appellant Marjorie Steadman be denied attorneys’ fees. We affirm in part and remand the matter for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Charles and Marjorie Steadman were married on October 10, 1977 and lived together as husband and wife for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kephart v. KephartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Ritz v. RitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Darling v. DarlingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rachal v. RachalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Psaromatis v. English Holdings I, L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Clark v. ClarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Maybin v. StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Tydings v. TydingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.