United States v. Nicodemo Scarfo A/K/A "The Little Guy,"
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge. *
Because the prosecution’s evidence describing the defendant’s organized crime group might have caused anxiety among the jurors, the trial judge withheld their identities before and after voir dire in this extortion case. In these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion either in adopting that procedure or in explaining it to the jury. We also conclude that other crimes evidence was properly received and that the limiting instructions were appropriate. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of conviction.
Defendant Scarfo was convicted of…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Allan RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.