Ittman v. Kracke & Flanders Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
This is a rule by a receiver against a mortgage creditor to recover certain taxes paid by the receiver on a piece of real estate upon which the mortgage creditor held a conventional mortgage. The defendant in rule denied liability, -and alleges that the receiver should have paid the taxes from certain rents realized from the real estate. There was judgment making the rule absolute, and the defendant has appealed.
The record shows that the receiver was appointed on September 26, 1923. The receiver paid the state and city taxes for the year of 1923 on January 31, 1924, with subrogation, out of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. Teutonia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Succession of FineganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- W. W. Carre Co. v. International Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Succession of SussmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Ittman v. Kracke & Flanders Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Ducote v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Ducote v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.