Legal Opinion
In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 8, 1936No. 33658PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
Intervener, as holder and owner of certain bonds and interest coupons, which were payable at the Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, in New Orleans, on March 1, 1933, claimed a lien and privilege on the general assets of the bank, under Act No. 63 of 1926, on the ground that the bank was the agent for collection, remittance, or delivery of the proceeds, and not a depositary of them.
The liquidators denied that this was a collection and remittance or delivery banking transaction and averred that the funds were deposited under the express and implied authorization of the owner or…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Backhus v. Transit Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Miami Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Smith v. Town of VintonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Washington v. St. Charles Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Gautreau v. Board of Electrical ExaminersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.