Legal Opinion

Succession of Sussman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 25, 1929No. 29353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

Richard Sussman died testate on April 29, 1927, leaving an estate consisting of both real and personal property. The executor named in the will qualified. An inventory of the estate was made which showed that it consisted of one piece of real ■estate and some personal property. The real estate was incumbered with a vendor’s lien, and all except a small portion of the personal property with chattel mortgages. The succession was hopelessly insolvent, the debts due by it exceeding the inventoried value of the property more than $8,000. All of the property of the succession was sold, on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Succession of FineganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Salaun v. Their CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Succession of CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Laurel Grove Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Ittman v. Kracke & Flanders Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Succession of IsraelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Succession of Jessen v. Calcasieu Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. Morere v. Howard Odorless Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API