Legal Opinion

Ittman v. Kracke & Flanders Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1925No. 9690PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

B. A. Flanders was a creditor of Kracke and Flanders for $24,000 secured by mortgage on property owned by Kracke and Flanders. Kracke and Flanders went into the hands of a receiver in September, 1923; in February, 1924, the Receiver obtained an order for the sale of the mortgaged property on terms of cash, the purchaser to assume the taxes of 1924; at the sale the property was adjudicated to B. A. Flanders, mortgage creditor, for a price less than his mortgage. In accordance with jurisprudence Flanders claimed the right to retain in his hands the amount of the purchase price accruing to him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bland v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. Succession of TricheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  3. Hollier v. Widow GonorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  4. In re the Succession of BellowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  5. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ittman v. Kracke & Flanders Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Smith v. Bank of RobelineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API