Clements v. . Rogers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil actioN, tried before Clark, Judge, and a jury, at October Civil Term, 1885, of Wake Superior Court. The defendants appealed. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMerriMON, J.
The motion to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the order appealed from is interlocutory and an appeal does not. lie at the present stage of the action, cannot be allowed. The action involves the settlement of an alleged agency that embraced numerous and important pecuniary transactions,» running through many years. The defendants allege that there was a settlement of all matters embraced by that agency in July., 1875, and that the principal then executed to the agent, who was the testator of the defendant executrix, an acquittance and discharge as to all liabilities on his part, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Capell v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Humble v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Heilig v. . DumasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- Commissioners of Wake v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Price v. . EcclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Grant v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Royster v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.