Legal Opinion

Selheimer v. Manganese Corp. of America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1966No. Appeals, 90 and 96PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

These appeals stem from a stockholders’ derivative suit in equity instituted by certain stockholders of Manganese Corporation of America (Manganese) against Manganese and Ernest P. Pie, Albert W. Him-far, Nelson Kusner and Charles A. Gillan, Jr., who, at various times, were the officers and managing majority directors of Manganese. After the commencement of this suit in the Court of Common Pleas No. 3 of Philadelphia County, Perry N. Selheimer, a director of Manganese throughout the time the corporation was engaged in business activity, was severed as a parly…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bailey v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Bowerman v. HamnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Pruner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Francis v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Cuker v. MikalauskasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API