Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1936No. Appeals, 329 and 330PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

The thousand page record in these equity proceedings is replete with intricate facts, extensive exhibits, complicated financial reports of expert accountants, and nearly three hundred requests for findings of facts and conclusions of law. There are so many transactions involved — some vital, others incidental to the principal issues — that not even a bare summary can be given within the limits of a judicial opinion. The suit is brought by a number of shareholders of a corporation to compel defendant, its president, to account for profits made through his personal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Deemer v. Weaver, Exrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Farwell v. Pyle-National Electric Headlight Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. SeltzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Bird Coal & Iron Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Hall v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  3. United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Zahn v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API