Legal Opinion
Partington v. Houck
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 10, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the Court are two motions: Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part and to dismiss in part and Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction.
On May 17, 2010, Defendant James W. Houck, in his official capacity as the Judge Advocate General of the Navy (the “Navy JAG”), indefinitely suspended Plaintiff Earle A. Partington, a civilian attorney, from the practice of law in any and all proceedings involving Navy and Marine Corps personnel (“naval courts”). This decision followed an ethics…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jordon v. QuanderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Spelman v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Earle Partington v. James HouckCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013